Undergraduate Application Essays [A Comprehensive List of All Types of Essays You Might Need To Write for University Applications]
- kaushal984
- Apr 25
- 20 min read
Updated: Apr 30
Most students preparing for university applications think of the essays as one task. They set aside time, open a document, and start writing. What they discover, usually too late in the cycle, is that they are not writing one thing. They are writing between four and eight structurally different documents, each evaluated by a different set of criteria, each requiring a different register, and each capable of being badly damaged by applying the instincts developed for a different type.
A student who writes a Common App essay beautifully and then brings those same instincts to a UCAS Personal Statement has made a costly mistake. A student who has spent six weeks on a reflective personal narrative and then opens a UC application in late November is encountering a completely different format for the first time at the worst possible moment. A student who treats a Singapore short-response question the way they treated an Ashoka intellectual essay will produce something too expansive, too literary, and entirely wrong for the context.
This guide maps the full landscape of undergraduate application essays. It classifies them by type rather than by destination, explains what each type is trying to do and how it is evaluated, and then covers what the essays actually look like at each major destination. If you are applying to more than one country, read this before you read any destination-specific guide. The map should come before the territory.
Five Types of Undergraduate Application Essay
The essays across all major undergraduate destinations fall into five distinct types. Some applications require only one. Most require two or three. A student applying to the US, UK, Canada, Singapore, and India simultaneously is writing across all five, often in parallel.
Type 1: The Personal Statement (Narrative)
This type of essay asks you to show who you are as a person through a specific, honest, first-person story. It is not asking you to argue for your academic readiness or to list what you have done. It is asking for the texture of how you think, what you find genuinely interesting, and what cannot be found anywhere else in your application.
Admissions readers evaluating this type ask whether the student has a voice and a perspective that the numbers in their file cannot show. The failure mode is an essay that is technically responsive but personally generic. A reader who finishes and thinks 'this student told me their background was important' has not learned anything. A reader who finishes and thinks 'I now understand something specific about how this student sees the world' has.
Where you will encounter it: The Common App personal statement is the clearest version of this type. The NTU ABA essay (topics 1 and 2) asks for the same thing in 500 words. The Ashoka personal essay (Essay 2) is the closest Indian university equivalent. Elements of the UBC Personal Profile, particularly the 'what is important to you and why' question, draw on the same skills.
The register: Personal, specific, honest. The best versions are quietly literary without trying to be. The worst perform emotion or impressiveness rather than showing either.
Type 2: The Academic Motivation Statement
This type asks you to make a structured case that you are intellectually prepared for and engaged with a specific academic subject. It is not interested in who you are as a person in any general sense. It is interested in whether you understand what you are signing up for and whether you have gone beyond your school syllabus to pursue the subject independently.
Admissions teams evaluating this type are asking whether the student's interest is real or performed, and whether their preparation is adequate for the intellectual demands of the program. What separates strong from weak responses is what admissions teams call super-curricular engagement: evidence that you have read, explored, and thought about the subject beyond what your school required.
Where you will encounter it: The UCAS Personal Statement (Questions 1 and 2) is the most structured version. The Oxbridge Personal Statement is the most demanding version, with the emphasis almost entirely academic. The FLAME SOP, the Krea Personal Story, and the JSLH Personal Statement at OP Jindal all fall within this type. Waterloo AIF short-answer questions also belong here.
The register: Structured, evidence-based, closer to argument than narrative. Where Type 1 shows you as a person, Type 2 shows you as a thinker in a specific field. The most common cross-contamination error is writing a Type 1 essay when a Type 2 is required.
Type 3: The Short-Answer Portfolio
This type builds a multi-dimensional picture of you through four or more separate, focused responses, each targeting a different dimension of your character, experience, or thinking. No single response is trying to show everything. The portfolio as a whole is.
Readers evaluate whether the full set of responses presents a complete, interesting, and specific person, and whether the student has selected experiences that collectively cover different ground rather than returning to the same themes. A strong portfolio has range. A weak one has repetition.
Where you will encounter it: The UC Personal Insight Questions (4 from 8, each capped at 350 words) are the most analytically demanding version. The NUS five short-response questions are a tighter version, with per-question character limits of 500 to 1,100 characters. The UBC Personal Profile is a hybrid of Types 3 and 5.
The register: Direct, concrete, evidence-driven. Not narrative in the Common App sense. Students who bring the expansive, exploratory voice of the Common App essay to a UC PIQ consistently over-write. Students who bring the formal argument structure of the UCAS statement consistently under-personalize.
Type 4: The Supplemental Essay
Supplemental essays are university-specific written components that sit alongside the Common App personal statement. Where the personal statement is one document going everywhere, supplements are written individually for each school. At selective US universities, they are read with at least as much attention as the personal statement, often more. They come in several sub-types: Why This University, Why This Major, Community or Diversity, Short Takes (35 to 250 words on rotating prompts), and additional essays specific to particular programs.
The core evaluation question across all supplemental sub-types is whether this student has done specific, genuine research into this institution, or whether they are submitting a template that could apply to twenty other schools. A 'Why Us' essay that does not name anything specific to the institution will not distinguish you from the applicants around you.
Where you will encounter it: Most selective US universities that use the Common App require at least one supplemental. Some require several. Remember, supplements are not afterthoughts.
The register: Varies by sub-type, but the consistent requirement across all of them is institutional specificity. A supplement that is not specific to the school it is written for is a supplement that has not been written yet.
Type 5: The Structured Achievement and Activity Account
This type asks you to describe specific activities, responsibilities, and accomplishments in writing, in a structured format, as a formal part of the application review. It is less obviously an essay and more obviously a form, which is exactly why students consistently under-prepare for it. It is, however, read carefully.
Readers look for specificity and honesty about what you actually did, as distinct from what the organization you belonged to did. 'I was a member of the robotics team' is not a Type 5 response. 'As lead programmer for the drive-train system, I wrote and tested the motor control code across three competition cycles' is. The quality of the language in these descriptions signals directly whether a student had genuine depth of involvement or nominal participation.
Where you will encounter it: The Waterloo AIF activity descriptions, the U of T Engineering OSP activity listings, the Ashoka Non-Academic Engagements section, the NUS achievements list, and the UBC activity inventory all fall within this type. The Common App activities list, though not technically an essay, rewards the same specificity.
The register: First-person, concrete, responsibility-focused. Not a resume and not a personal essay. Every sentence should describe what you specifically did, not what the program or club aimed to achieve.
Using AI to Write your Undergrad Application Essays?
With the growing availability of AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, etc.), you might be tempted to use them to write essays including Common App essay, UCAS Personal Statement, UC PIQs, or supplemental essays. Is that a wise approach? How low should your AI Detection score be? What do Universities have to say regarding this issue? Click the button to know more
The Key Essays: What Each Looks Like in Practice
The following are the various application essays that you would need to write
The Common App Personal Statement
The Common App personal statement is a single essay of up to 650 words, written once and submitted to every institution you apply to through the Common App platform, which means it goes to all schools on your list simultaneously without modification. You choose one from seven available prompts, though the prompt functions as a frame rather than a directive. Strong essays are almost always built around a story the student wanted to tell first, with the prompt chosen afterward to fit it. The essay is not the place to summarize your achievements, explain your academic record, or make the case for why you deserve admission. It is the one space in the entire application where the admissions reader is looking for something that cannot be found in your transcript, your activities list, or your recommendations.
What separates strong Common App essays from generic ones is specificity and honesty rather than drama or impressiveness. The student who writes about a significant life event in general terms will consistently lose ground to the student who writes about a small, ordinary moment with precision and genuine reflection. Admissions readers at competitive universities read hundreds of essays about hardship, leadership, and transformation. They read very few about something specific, unexpected, and genuinely that student's own. The best Common App essays are ones that could not have been written by any other applicant, because the story they tell is particular enough to be irreducibly individual. The Common App opens on August 1 each year. A strong essay typically requires four to five substantive drafts, which takes considerably longer than most students expect.
For more information, you may refer to our guide on How to Write a Common App Essay
Supplemental Essays
Supplemental essays are university-specific written components that sit alongside the Common App personal statement at most selective US universities. Where the personal statement is one document going everywhere, supplements are written individually for each school, and at selective institutions they are read with at least as much attention as the personal statement. Most Common App member institutions that require supplements ask for at least a Why Us essay, which asks you to demonstrate specific, honest knowledge of the institution and articulate why it is a particular fit for you. Beyond the Why Us, supplements come in several sub-types: Why This Major (explaining your academic interest in your intended field), Community or Diversity (what you bring to the campus community and how your background shapes your engagement with others), Short Takes (responses of 35 to 250 words on rotating prompts that test personality and self-awareness in compressed space), and additional essays specific to particular schools or programs.
The supplemental landscape varies considerably by institution, and understanding what each school is actually looking for requires reading its prompts carefully rather than assuming they are interchangeable. For example:
MIT asks applicants to respond to five prompts of 100 words each, covering what they do for fun, a community they belong to, and a challenge they have faced, which is a format that rewards a student who can be specific and interesting within very tight constraints.
Yale asks 'What is it about Yale that has led you to apply?' in 125 words, which sounds manageable and is in fact one of the harder short supplements to write well, because the length demands exceptional precision and generic praise of Yale's ranking or faculty is immediately visible.
The University of Chicago is known for its Uncommon Essay, an open-ended prompt on a rotating set of deliberately unusual questions (recent examples have included prompts about paradoxes, what can and cannot be taught, and the nature of counting) that rewards intellectual playfulness and genuine willingness to take an interpretive risk.
Princeton asks about intellectual interests, future plans, and one of three personal essay topics, spread across roughly 650 words of supplemental writing.
Harvard's supplement includes an optional Parting Thoughts section that has become more significant as a space to address anything the rest of the application does not capture. The through-line across all of them is the same: a supplement that could have been written by any student applying to that school will not distinguish you from the applicants around you.
The UCAS Personal Statement (Including Oxbridge)
The UCAS Personal Statement is the written component of the UK undergraduate application, submitted through the UCAS portal and sent simultaneously to all five universities on your list. For 2026 entry onwards, UCAS replaced the old open-ended 4,000-character essay with a structured format of three questions: why you want to study this course or subject, how your qualifications and studies have prepared you for it, and what you have done outside education to develop further. The total character allocation across all three is 4,000, with a minimum of 350 characters per question. The most important thing to understand about the UCAS Personal Statement is that it is an argument, not a narrative. Where the Common App essay asks who you are as a person, the UCAS statement asks whether you understand the subject you have chosen and whether you have done enough with that interest to justify the application. Super-curricular engagement, meaning reading, research, lectures, and exploration beyond your school timetable, is the primary evidence the statement is built around, and the distinction between listing super-curriculars and actually reflecting on what you took from them is one of the most consequential writing decisions in the document.
For more information, you may refer to our guide on How to Write the UCAS Personal Statement
A Note on UCAS Personal Statements for application to Oxford or Cambridge (Oxbridge)
Oxbridge applications use the same UCAS portal and the same three-question format, but the evaluation criteria shift considerably. At most UK universities, the personal statement serves as confirmation that you are a suitable candidate, read alongside your predicted grades. At Oxford and Cambridge, it functions as the first stage of a multi-stage intellectual assessment, and the emphasis is almost entirely academic. Close to 90% of the statement should demonstrate subject engagement, with extracurricular activities playing almost no role unless they connect directly to the field you are applying to study. Both universities also require written work submissions for most humanities and social sciences courses: these are school essays, marked by your teacher, submitted in their original marked form, not written for the application. Oxford's written work deadline is November 10. The Oxbridge UCAS deadline is October 15, and it is the single most commonly missed deadline in the entire UK application process, arriving months before the January deadline that applies to every other UK university. Students from India, the UAE, and Singapore who are not connected to schools with strong Oxbridge application experience miss this deadline every year.
For more details, you can refer to our guide on Things to Know about Oxbridge Applications.
UC Personal Insight Questions
The University of California system does not use the Common App. It runs its own application portal at universityofcalifornia.edu, which covers all nine UC campuses simultaneously, and the written component is the Personal Insight Questions: eight prompts from which you choose four, each answered in no more than 350 words. The prompts cover leadership, creativity, talent or skill, educational opportunity or barrier, significant challenge, an academic subject that inspires you, community contribution, and an open-ended why-you question. The four responses you choose collectively need to present a multi-dimensional picture of who you are, which means the selection process is as important as the writing. A set of four responses that all tell versions of the same story is a portfolio problem that no amount of good writing will fix. The application opens August 1 and closes November 30, which falls directly in the middle of Common App Early Decision season. Students who do not start PIQ brainstorming in September consistently find themselves drafting under time pressure in the final fortnight of November, when their Common App energy is already at its lowest.
The UC evaluates applications through a comprehensive review framework that considers thirteen factors, of which the PIQs most directly address factors relating to talent, achievement, leadership, community contribution, and life circumstances. What distinguishes UC PIQs from other short-answer formats is that 350 words is genuinely short, roughly one side of A4, and the format does not tolerate a slow start. The first 40 to 50 words need to ground the reader in something specific, and the response needs to have made its central point well before the final paragraph. Students who open with a general statement about the importance of leadership, or with a biographical introduction before getting to the actual story, are using a third of their available space on material that is not doing any evaluative work. The most consistent failure across all eight prompts is the same: students write about what happened rather than showing how they thought, which leaves the reader with a record of events rather than a sense of a person.
For more information, you may refer to our guide on How to Answer University of California Personal Insight Questions (UC-PIQs)
Canadian University Essay Requirements
Canada has no national undergraduate application portal. Ontario universities use OUAC, British Columbia uses EducationPlannerBC, and each province runs its own system. Most Canadian universities, including McGill for the majority of its programs, are primarily grade-based and require no essay at all. The institutions where written components carry genuine weight are the University of British Columbia, the University of Toronto (specifically Engineering), the University of Waterloo, and the Smith School of Business at Queen's. UBC requires a Personal Profile of five short-answer questions with character limits ranging from 500 to 2,100 characters per question, focused on who you are, what matters to you, your activities, and your academic context. Waterloo requires an Admissions Information Form covering detailed activity descriptions, work and volunteer experience, program-specific short-answer questions, and a context section for explaining anything unusual in your academic record. U of T Engineering requires an Online Student Profile that includes written responses and, unlike any other Canadian undergraduate application, a recorded video response to questions you see for the first time in the portal, with two minutes to prepare before recording begins.
The most important thing to understand about Canadian applications is the register they reward. Neither the narrative voice of the Common App nor the formal argument structure of the UCAS statement serves these applications well. Canadian short-answer questions want accounts: specific experiences described concisely, with clear evidence of what they involved and what they revealed. The character limits are tighter than most students expect, and the instinct to open with context or framing before getting personal produces openings that a UBC reader recognizes as generic within the first sentence. The UBC deadline falls on January 15, which comes after most US Early Decision and Early Action deadlines and helps with sequencing. The Waterloo AIF has a recommended early submission date of December 2, which falls directly in the middle of US Regular Decision drafting season. Both need to be started earlier than most students plan for, and students who treat Canadian applications as a lower-effort tier consistently submit weaker material than their profile deserves.
For more information, you may refer to our guide on Canadian University Undergrad Application Essays
Singaporean University Essay Requirements
Singapore has no centralized application portal. NUS, NTU, and SMU each run their own application system with their own deadlines and their own written component formats. At NUS, the written component consists of five short-response questions with per-question character limits of 500 to 1,100 characters, plus a structured achievements list covering up to four activities. The questions assess your interests, aptitude, and fit for your specific program rather than your life story in any broad sense. NUS College, the residential liberal arts honors program within NUS, has a separate and considerably more demanding written application that includes a 600-word intellectual essay on a rotating open-ended prompt and is evaluated as a distinct application from the standard NUS program. NTU's written requirement for most programs is optional: the ABA essay of up to 500 words is used by students who want to be assessed on factors beyond grades, and it asks for a personal narrative or program motivation response on one of three topics. SMU asks for a 300-word outstanding achievements description as part of its standard application, and the quality of this section is directly connected to whether you are shortlisted for an interview, which is the central evaluative mechanism in SMU's admissions process.
The register that Singapore written components reward is the most direct and purpose-driven of any destination covered in this guide. A student who opens their NUS short response with a general statement about passion for the subject has already used a significant portion of a 1,100-character response on something that conveys nothing. A student who opens with a specific observation, decision, or moment that connects directly to the question being asked is using the format correctly. Interviews are a formal and significant part of the process at SMU and for certain NUS and NTU programs, which means the written components set up the interview rather than concluding the evaluation. Students who write about things they cannot speak about fluently in a follow-up conversation are creating problems for themselves at the next stage. One practical point that Indian applicants frequently miss: NTU's Renaissance Engineering Program is restricted to Singapore Citizens and Permanent Residents, regardless of academic profile. Indian students who find REP listed on NTU's website should note the eligibility restriction before investing time in that direction.
For more information, you may refer to our guide on Undergraduate Application Essays for Singaporean Universities
Indian University Essay Requirements
The Indian liberal arts universities that require substantive application essays, primarily Ashoka, FLAME, Krea, and OP Jindal's School of Liberal Arts and Humanities, represent a category that almost no public guidance addresses with the depth it deserves. Ashoka has the most rigorous written application of any Indian undergraduate institution. The online form requires a minimum of three non-academic engagement descriptions with reflection on each, a book list of three to five titles with a written recommendation for one, and two mandatory essays: one intellectual, engaging with an idea, concept, or theory you find interesting and explaining how you have pursued it beyond your school curriculum; and one personal, a significant experience that has shaped your perspective. These essays are not a formality. Ashoka's own application guide identifies them as the primary filter for shortlisting, and the interview panel uses them as the anchor for their questions, which means a generic application leads to a thin interview. FLAME requires a Statement of Purpose covering academic interests, career goals, and specific reasons for choosing FLAME, alongside an on-the-spot essay written in 20 minutes during the assessment process. Krea focuses on the Personal Story in Section 1, which asks you to demonstrate the kind of cross-disciplinary intellectual curiosity that its Interwoven Learning philosophy is built around. The JSLH Personal Statement at OP Jindal is 1,000 words and asks you to explain your intellectual interests and how the school's interdisciplinary, globally oriented program connects to them specifically.
What distinguishes these applications from every other type in this guide is what they are specifically looking for: evidence of intellectual life outside the school curriculum. Ashoka's intellectual essay is not asking you to describe what a concept is. It is asking what you have done about your interest in it. A student who finds behavioral economics interesting and can describe the basic premise of one well-known book has not demonstrated intellectual engagement. A student who can name a specific tension within behavioral economics, describe what reading or observation sharpened that tension, and articulate a question they are still sitting with has. The students who produce the strongest applications to these institutions are not always the ones with the most impressive academic records. They are the ones who have developed the habit of pursuing ideas independently and who can write about that pursuit with enough specificity that the essay could not have been written by anyone else. Students applying to Ashoka alongside international options who treat it as a quick additional application consistently submit their weakest work. Ashoka's Round 1 typically closes in late November, before most Common App Regular Decision deadlines. It needs the same investment that the international applications receive.
For more information, you may refer to our guide on Writing Undergraduate Application Essays for Indian Universities
Which Essay Types Apply to Which Destinations
Use the table below as a quick reference once you have confirmed which countries and universities you are applying to. Each destination links to the relevant InkStudio pillar blog covering its written components in full.
Destination | Essay Types Required |
US — Common App schools | Type 1 (personal statement) + Type 4 (supplementals) |
US — UC system | Type 3 (PIQ portfolio) |
UK — non-Oxbridge | Type 2 (UCAS Personal Statement) |
UK — Oxford or Cambridge | Type 2 (academic version) + written work submission |
Canada — UBC | Type 3 (Personal Profile) + Type 5 (activity accounts) |
Canada — U of T Engineering | Type 3 + Type 5 + video response |
Canada — Waterloo | Type 2 (short-answer questions) + Type 5 |
Canada — McGill | Primarily grade-based; no essay for most programs |
Singapore — NUS standard programs | Type 3 (short responses) + Type 5 (achievements list) |
Singapore — NUS College | Type 1 + Type 2 + Type 3 |
Singapore — NTU ABA | Type 1 (500-word personal essay) |
Singapore — SMU | Type 5 (outstanding achievements, 300 words) |
India — Ashoka | Type 1 + Type 2 + Type 5 + on-the-spot essay |
India — FLAME | Type 2 (SOP) + on-the-spot essay |
India — Krea | Type 2 (Personal Story) |
India — OP Jindal (JSLH) | Type 2 (1,000-word personal statement) |
India — Plaksha | Type 1 + Type 4 (program-fit essay) |
Why the Register Matters as Much as the Content
The five types and the destination write-ups above are organized around what each essay is trying to do. There is one more thing worth making explicit before you start writing for any of them: the register, meaning the specific voice and mode of address each type rewards, differs enough between types that the wrong one will damage even strong material.
The Common App personal statement rewards a voice that is specific, personal, and honest. At its best it reads like a very articulate version of how the student actually speaks and thinks. The goal is not formal polish. The goal is for a reader to feel they have encountered a real and particular person.
The UCAS Personal Statement rewards a voice that is structured and evidence-based without being cold. It is closer to an argument than a story, and the evidence it is built on is specific intellectual engagement with the subject rather than personal narrative. Students who write UCAS statements in the warm, reflective voice appropriate for a Common App essay consistently produce responses that feel personal but prove nothing about academic readiness.
UC PIQs reward clarity and directness above everything else. 350 words cannot sustain extended reflection or literary self-consciousness. Each response needs to make its point, show the specific evidence for it, and stop. The students who do this best tend to be the ones who draft their PIQs in plain language first and resist the urge to make the writing sound more sophisticated than the format requires.
Canadian short-answer questions reward the same directness as UC PIQs, with an additional emphasis on concrete specificity about what you did and what it revealed. The instinct that many students from Indian school curricula bring to these responses, opening with a broader contextual statement before getting personal, is almost always the wrong move. The first sentence of a UBC response should be about something that actually happened.
Singapore written components reward purposeful brevity. The per-question character limits at NUS leave no room for framing or warm-up. Every sentence either answers the question or it does not.
Indian liberal arts applications, particularly Ashoka, reward intellectual honesty over impressiveness. A student who writes about what they have genuinely thought about and pursued, in specific and concrete terms, will consistently outperform a student who writes about what they think sounds most academically sophisticated. This is the format that is most unforgiving of performed enthusiasm, because the readers evaluating these applications have seen a great deal of it.
The costliest mistake across all of these is carrying the instincts from one type into a different one. It is also among the most common.
The Calendar Problem: When You Are Actually Writing What
Each destination-specific guide covers deadlines within its own timeline. This is the only place in the InkStudio blog library where you can see the full essay calendar across all destinations at once, and where the overlaps and pressure points become visible.
June to July. This is brainstorming season for the Common App personal statement, and also the right time to start the Ashoka application if you are targeting Round 1. Both require genuine reflection that cannot be accelerated later. Starting the Common App essay in August for a November deadline is not starting; it is first-drafting with no time to revise properly.
August 1. The Common App opens. The UC application also opens. Begin both the personal statement and the UC PIQ brainstorming now if you have not already. The students who do this in August are the ones who have four or five drafts of their PIQs by October. The students who open the UC portal in mid-November are writing PIQs in their worst possible conditions.
September. Active drafting for the Common App personal statement. UCAS preparation begins. The Waterloo AIF has a recommended early submission date of December 2, which means the AIF activity descriptions and short-answer questions should be in progress now rather than in November.
October 15. The Oxbridge UCAS deadline, at 6pm UK time. This is a hard cutoff that arrives weeks before the January UCAS deadline that most students assume applies to everyone. If Oxford or Cambridge is on your list, this date dominates the October calendar, and everything else in the cycle adjusts around it. Admissions test registration for most Oxbridge courses has to happen well before this date, sometimes in September.
November 1 and 15. Common App Early Decision and Early Action deadlines. This is the most compressed window in the entire cycle, and it coincides with a student needing to complete UC PIQs by November 30. Students who have not started PIQs before November typically find themselves writing four 350-word responses in the final two weeks of the month, when their writing energy is already depleted by Common App work.
November 30. UC application deadline. No exceptions.
Late November. Ashoka Round 1 closes. Students who have been treating the Ashoka application as something to handle after the US deadlines are done are submitting it at the moment they are least equipped to write well.
December 2. Waterloo AIF recommended early submission date.
January 15. UBC application deadline for international students. The UCAS deadline for non-Oxbridge UK universities is January 29.
February to March. Singapore university application windows close. NUS typically closes for international students with CBSE and ISC qualifications in late February. SMU closes in mid-March. These dates are often missed by students who assume Singapore applications run on the same calendar as US or UK ones.
The point of laying this out is not to alarm you but to make a structural reality visible. The October-to-November window requires a student to be finalizing a Common App personal statement, writing four UC PIQs from scratch, potentially managing an Oxbridge deadline, and staying on top of Canadian and Indian application timelines, all at once. That workload is manageable only if the groundwork has been done in the months before it.
If you are working on any of these applications and would like InkStudio's support on the written components, leave your details on the contact page and we will be in touch.
Comments